Decisions of the Information Commissioner

The Senior Investigator affirmed the Revenue’s decision. She found that the records, while relating to the Notice, also contained details of positions that the Revenue would take in any settlement negotiations that it might enter into with the applicant (section 30(1)(c)). She also found that, on balance, the public interest was better served by refusing to grant the FOI request concerned.

The Senior Investigator affirmed ComReg’s decision to refuse access to the TETRA information redacted from the two reports under section 32(1)(a)(x) and to refuse access to the redacted PMR information under section 36(1)(b).

The Senior Investigator affirmed the HSE’s decision to refuse access to any further relevant records under section 15(1)(a) of the FOI Act on the ground that no further records exist or can be found.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the Department’s decision. She found that section 29(1) applies, in that the records relate to a deliberative process and that the granting of the request would be contrary to the public interest.

The Senior Investigator varied the Department’s decision. She affirmed its decision on certain records under sections 28, 31(1)(a) and 31(1)(b). She annulled its decision on the remaining records and directed their release.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Department and found that section 15(1)(c) applied to the request for access to the records.

Dhaingnigh an tImscrúdaitheoir Sinsearach breith na Roinne agus chinn sé go raibh feidhm ag alt 15(1)(c) maidir leis an iarraidh chun rochtain a fháil ar na taifid

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Council to refuse access to the withheld information under section 42(m)(i) of the FOI Act.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the Department’s decision.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Department. He found that it had justified its decision to refuse access to further records under sections 15(1)(a) and 31(1)(a) of the FOI Act.