Decisions of the Information Commissioner

The Senior Investigator affirmed the HPRA's decision.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the HPRA's decision. He found that it was justified in its decision to grant access to specific information in the record which the applicant argued to be exempt from release under sections 35 and 36 of the FOI Act.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the HPRA's decision.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the HPRA.

The Investigator affirmed the decision of the Council.

The Investigator annulled TCD's decision and directed it to consider the applicant's requests afresh.

The Investigator varied RTÉ's decision. He found that RTÉ was justified in refusing access to parts of the report under section 37(1) of the Act. He found that RTÉ was not justified in refusing access to the remainder of the report having regard to sections 29(1)(a)/(b), 30(1)(a)/(b) and 35(1)(a) of the Act and he directed the release of the remainder of the report to the applicant.

The Investigator affirmed the Council's decision.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the HPRAs decision. He found that it was justified in its decision to grant access to specific information in the report which the applicant argued to be exempt from release under sections 35 and 36 of the FOI Act.

The Senior Investigator varied the decision of UCC. He found it was not justified in refusing access to certain information that had been redacted from the records at issue under sections 29(1), 36(1)(b) and 37(1) and he directed its release.