Decisions of the Information Commissioner

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the hospital to refuse the applicant’s request under section 37(1) of the Act.

The Senior Investigator affirmed Tusla's decision.

The Senior Investigator affirmed DCU's decision.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Defence Forces to refuse access, under section 37 of the FOI Act, to the records sought.

The Senior Investigator varied the decision of the Council. He found it was not justified in refusing access to certain information in the records at issue under sections 31(1)(a) and 37(1) and he directed its release.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the Department's decision to release the record at issue.

The Senior Investigator annulled the decision of SVUH and directed the release of the Code.

The Senior Investigator varied the decision of the NAS. He found that the NAS was justified in withholding, under section 37(1) of the Act, certain third party personal information from the record, but that it was not justified in refusing access to a redacted version of the record in the format sought, namely a copy of the audio recording. He directed the NAS to provide the applicant with a redacted version of the audio recording.

The Senior Investigator annulled the Council's initial decision on certain of the issues the subject of the applicant's internal review application. She directed the Council to make a fresh decision on those particular issues in accordance with the provisions of the FOI Act.

The Senior Investigator Affirmed the HSE's decision.