Decisions of the Information Commissioner

The Investigator affirmed Tusla's decision.

The Investigator affirmed the Council's decision.

The Investigator varied the Council's decision. She found that it was justified in its decision to refuse access to relevant records on the basis that they fall outside the scope of the FOI Act by virtue of section 42(ja). She found that it was not justified in refusing to confirm or deny the existence of any further records on the basis of section 37(6) and directed it to issue a fresh decision in this respect.

The Investigator annulled the Council's decision and directed it to make a fresh decision on the matter.

The Investigator found that the Department was not justified in its decision to extend the period for consideration of the applicant's request under section 14(1)(a) of the Act and annulled its decision.

The Investigator affirmed the Council's decision.

The Investigator affirmed the Council's decision, under section 37(1) of the FOI Act, to refuse to release the record.

The Investigator annulled the decision of the HSE and directed it to consider the applicant's request afresh.

The Investigator annulled the HSE's refusal of the request. She found that the applicant was entitled to access to the records, further to the provisions of Section 37(8) of the FOI Act and associated Regulations. The Investigator directed the HSE to grant the request, subject to the redaction of personal information about parties other than the applicant and/or her son.

The Investigator affirmed the Department's decision.