Decisions of the Information Commissioner

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the HSE.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the HSE’s decision on the ground that the applicant had not shown that the information at issue is, on the balance of probabilities, incomplete, incorrect or misleading.

The Senior Investigator affirmed DCU’s decision.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the Department’s decision.

The Commissioner affirmed the decision of the Department.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the Hospital’s decision, under section 15(1)(a) of the FOI Act

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Hospital to refuse access to the records sought under section 15(1)(a) of the FOI Act.

The Senior Investigator varied the decision of the Council. He affirmed the decision with regard to three parts of the applicant’s request and annulled the decision with regard to a fourth part concerning the costs of the new Plan. He directed the Council to undertake a fresh decision making process in respect of that part.

The Senior Investigator varied the decision of the HSE. While he found that the HSE was justified in refusing access to the vast majority of the information at issue under section 37(1), he found that a small amount of information was not exempt and directed its release.

The Senior Investigator affirmed TUSLA’s decision.