Decisions of the Information Commissioner

The Senior Investigator varied the Council's decision. He found that it was justified in refusing access to certain records pursuant to section 42(ja). He found that it was not justified in refusing access to the remaining records under sections 30(1)(b), 31(1)(a), 36(1) or 42(ja) of the FOI Act and directed their release.

The Investigator affirmed the Council's decision.

The Investigator affirmed the decision of the Department. She found that the Department was justified, under section 31(1)(a), in refusing to release the record on the grounds that it was legally privileged.

The Investigator affirmed the Council's decision.

The Investigator annulled the decision of the HSE and directed it to consider the matter afresh.

The Investigator varied the decision of the Department

The Investigator annulled the Department's decision and directed it to undertake a fresh decision making process.

The Investigator affirmed the Council's decision to refuse access to the information concerned under Section 42(m)(i) of the FOI Act.

The Investigator varied the decision of the Courts Service. He affirmed its decision to refuse access to court records under section 42(a)(i) of the Act. He also affirmed its decision to refuse access to further records under section 15(1)(a) of the Act. He annulled the decision of the Courts Service to refuse access to records under section 31(2)(b) of the Act and directed it to make a fresh decision on access to those records.

The Senior Investigator annulled the decision of the Council and directed release of the records at issue.