Decisions of the Information Commissioner

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Department and found that section 15(1)(c) applied to the request for access to the records.

Dhaingnigh an tImscrúdaitheoir Sinsearach breith na Roinne agus chinn sé go raibh feidhm ag alt 15(1)(c) maidir leis an iarraidh chun rochtain a fháil ar na taifid

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Council to refuse access to the withheld information under section 42(m)(i) of the FOI Act.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the Department’s decision.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Department. He found that it had justified its decision to refuse access to further records under sections 15(1)(a) and 31(1)(a) of the FOI Act.

The Senior Investigator varied the decision of the Defence Forces. He found that that it was not required, by virtue of section 10(2)(a), to provide a more detailed statement of reasons as to why the applicant was unsuccessful in his application for recruitment to the Defence Forces. He affirmed the decision of the Defence Forces to refuse access to four records under section 33(3)(a) of the FOI Act. He found that it was not justified in redacting certain information from four other records under section 33(1)(a) and he directed the release of the redacted information.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Council.

The Senior Investigator annulled the decision of the Council and directed release of the report, subject to the redaction of third party information that falls outside the scope of this review.

The Commissioner affirmed the decision of the Department to refuse access to the records at issue under sections 29(1) and 37(1) of the FOI Act.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Defence Forces. He found that the applicant had not shown, on the balance of probabilities, that the information at issue was incomplete, incorrect, or misleading.