Decisions of the Information Commissioner

The Senior Investigator annulled the Council's decision to refuse access to the records and directed it to release the records.

The Senior Investigator varied the Department's decision in this case. He directed release of the majority of the records with the redaction of a small amount of personal information under section 37(1).

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Department. He found that it was justified in refusing access to the records at issue under sections 31 and 37 of the FOI Act.

The Senior Investigator annulled the decision of EirGrid and directed it to undertake a fresh decision-making process in respect of the request.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the NCSE. He found that the NCSE was justified in refusing the applicant's request under section 9 of the FOI Act on the basis that the applicant had not provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the relevant records were incomplete, incorrect or misleading.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the PCRS

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of UCC to refuse the request under section 15(1)(g) on the ground that the request was vexatious.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the Council's decision.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Council to refuse the request under section 15(1)(g) on the ground that the request was vexatious.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the HSE to refuse access to records sought under section 15(1)(a) of the FOI Act, on the ground that they do not exist.