Decisions of the Information Commissioner

The Senior Investigator annulled the decision of the HSE and directed it to undertake a fresh decision-making process on the request.

The Senior Investigator annulled the Department's decision in this case. He directed the release of the records subject to the redaction of a small amount of personal information from two of the records under section 37(1).

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of TCD. He found that TCD had fulfilled the requirements of section 10 of the FOI Act in this case.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Department to refuse the request under section 15(1)(a) of the FOI Act.

The Senior Investigator varied UCC's decision. She found that it was justified in refusing access to the majority of the records under sections 30 and 37 of the FOI Act. She found that it was not justified in refusing the request insofar as it relates to the remaining records and directed their release.

The Senior Investigator found that the Defence Forces had not justified its decision. She annulled the decision to refuse access to the record under section 36 and directed the Defence Forces to release the record.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of TUSLA.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of TUSLA.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the HSE. He found that it was justified in refusing access to the information at issue under section 37(1) on the ground that release of the information would involve the disclosure of personal information relating to third parties.

The Senior Investigator annulled the Department’s decision and directed the release of the records to the applicant, subject to the redaction of parts of the records that do not fall within the scope of the review. She found that the Department was not justified in refusing access to the records under sections 29, 31, 32, 36 or 42 of the FOI Act.