Decisions of the Information Commissioner

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the NCSE. He found that the NCSE was justified in refusing the applicant's request under section 9 of the FOI Act on the basis that the applicant had not provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the relevant records were incomplete, incorrect or misleading.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the PCRS

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of UCC to refuse the request under section 15(1)(g) on the ground that the request was vexatious.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the Council's decision.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Council to refuse the request under section 15(1)(g) on the ground that the request was vexatious.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the HSE to refuse access to records sought under section 15(1)(a) of the FOI Act, on the ground that they do not exist.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Department.

The Senior Investigator annulled the Department's refusal of the request. He directed it to grant access to those parts of invoices covered by the request that contain the information sought.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Department.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the Council's decision to refuse access to the record. She found that in accordance with section 11, the FOI Act did not apply to the record as it was created before the commencement of the Act for local authorities.