Decisions of the Information Commissioner

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Department.

The Senior Investigator affirmed TUSLA’s decision.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the HSE’s decision.

The Senior Investigator annulled Revenue’s decision and directed it to undertake a fresh decision-making process.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the Department’s decision. He found that the Department is not required to disclose the existence or non-existence of the records sought under section 37(6) of the FOI Act.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the CSSO.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the Council’s decision.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the CSSO.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the Council’s decision.

The Senior Investigator varied the decision of the HSE. While he found that it was justified in refusing access to the phone number under section 37(1), he found it was not justified in refusing access to further relevant records on the ground that it had not conducted all reasonable searches in an effort to locate all relevant records. He directed the HSE to carry out a fresh decision making process in respect of the applicant’s request.