Decisions of the Information Commissioner

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the HSE.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the HSE to refuse access to the additional records sought under section 15(1)(a) of the FOI Act on the ground that no further records exist or can be found.

The Senior Investigator found that the NSCDA had not justified its refusal under sections 36 and 40 of the FOI Act. She annulled the decision of the NSCDA and directed release of the record.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Council

The Senior Investigator varied the decision of QQI. He directed QQI to amend the record by the addition of a specified statement.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the HSE.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Hospital to refuse access to the records sought under section 15(1)(a) of the FOI Act.

The Commissioner varied the decision of the Department. He directed the release of 62 records to the applicant in full or in part. He affirmed the Department's decision to refuse access to the remaining records under sections 31(1)(a), 35(1)(b), and 42(f).

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Council.

The Senior Investigator varied the decision of the Council. While he found that the Council was justified in redacting certain information under section 42(m)(i), he directed the release of a small amount of additional information contained in one of the records.