Decisions of the Information Commissioner

The Senior Investigator affirmed the Council's decision

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Courts Service.

The Senior Investigator varied the decision of Tusla. He affirmed Tusla's decision to refuse access to the majority of the information in the record concerned under section 37 of the Act. He annulled its decision to refuse to release the remaining information contained in the record which relates to the applicant's son and remitted the matter back to the Tusla for consideration afresh in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act 2014 (Section 37(8)) Regulations 2016.

The Senior Investigator varied the decision of the LSRA. He directed the release of the name and address of the legal practice on the ground that it was not personal information within the meaning of the FOI Act.

The Senior Investigator annulled Tusla's decision and remitted the request to be processed afresh.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of Tusla.

The Senior Investigator annulled the Council's decision to grant access to the records and directed the Council to conduct a fresh decision making process on the FOI request in accordance with the provisions of the FOI Act

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the NTPF

The Senior Investigator annulled the Department's decision.

The Senior Investigator varied the Agency's decision. She annulled its effective refusal of the list of AHBs and directed the Agency to make a new decision on this part of the request. She found that section 36(1)(b) applies to the returns and that the public interest did not weigh in favour of their release.