Summary: The Senior Investigator annulled the Board's decision and he directed it to conduct a fresh decision making process on the request.
Date: 23-11-2022
Case Number: OIC-127823-R6M1F1
Public Body: Legal Aid Board
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a),
Summary: The Investigator annulled Tusla's decision
Date: 23-11-2022
Case Number: OIC-125671-N6Z0P9
Public Body: Tusla
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a), s.37, s.37(1), s.37(7),
Summary: The Senior Investigator annulled the Department's decision and he directed it to process the request afresh.
Date: 21-11-2022
Case Number: OIC-127985-W0N5T6
Public Body: Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(g),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed CIB's decision.
Date: 18-11-2022
Case Number: OIC-125871-H1G8J0
Public Body: Citizens Information Board
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the Council's decision to refuse the request under section 42(m) of the FOI Act.
Date: 18-11-2022
Case Number: OIC-129283-F3Z6Z7
Public Body: Mayo County Council
Section of the Act.: s.42, s.42(m)(i),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Defence Forces.
Date: 18-11-2022
Case Number: OIC-115277-T4Z5G9
Public Body: Defence Forces
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a), s.31, s.31(1)(a),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the HSE's decision.
Date: 17-11-2022
Case Number: OIC-126016-W5Z1Q2
Public Body: Health Service Executive
Section of the Act.: s.37, s.37(1),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Department.
Date: 16-11-2022
Case Number: OIC-116773-C2M5R4
Public Body: Department of Justice
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a), s.31, s.31(1)(a), s.37, s.37(1), s.42, s.42(j),
Summary: The Senior Investigator annulled the decision of the Defence Forces. He directed it to undertake a fresh decision making process.
Date: 15-11-2022
Case Number: OIC-125682-Q3L8W0
Public Body: Defence Forces
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(i),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of TCD. He found that it was justified in refusing access, under section 29(1) of the Act, to the records sought.
Date: 15-11-2022
Case Number: OIC-116921-H5B5X5
Public Body: Trinity College Dublin
Section of the Act.: s.29, s.29(1),