Summary: The Investigator affirmed the Council's decision.
Date: 10-01-2024
Case Number: OIC-141681-K0Y2Z3
Public Body: Cork County Council
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(g),
Summary: The Investigator annulled CHI's decision and directed it to carry out a new decision making process on the applicant's request.
Date: 08-01-2024
Case Number: OIC-141486-X7P8S8
Public Body: Children's Health Ireland
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a), s.15(1)(c),
Summary: The Investigator affirmed the decision of Tailte Éireann.
Date: 05-01-2024
Case Number: OIC-138736-C4Y3H8
Public Body: Tailte Éireann
Section of the Act.: s.41, s.41(1)(a),
Summary: The Investigator affirmed the decision of the Department
Date: 22-12-2023
Case Number: OIC-122817-Q9Y2J8
Public Body: Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a), s.37, s.37(1),
Summary: The Investigator affirmed CHI's decision.
Date: 21-12-2023
Case Number: OIC-140325-C8F7F6
Public Body: Children's Health Ireland
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a),
Summary: The Investigator annulled Tusla's decision following the location of additional records during the course of this review and directed Tusla to undertake a fresh decision-making process on the applicants' FOI request.
Date: 21-12-2023
Case Number: OIC-140564-H9P9F8
Public Body: Tusla
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a),
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the decision of the DPC. While he found that a small amount of information contained in the record was exempt from release under section 36(1)(b), he found that the DPC had not justified its decision to refuse access to the rest of the record, and directed its release subject to the redaction of the names of specific software/IT systems used by the DPC.
Date: 21-12-2023
Case Number: OIC-140927-J1V5R7
Public Body: Data Protection Commission
Section of the Act.: s.29, s.29(1), s.29(1)(a), s.30, s.30(1)(a), s.30(1)(b), s.30(1)(c), s.32, s.32(1)(a)(iii), s.33, s.33(3)(c)(iii), s.36, s.36(1)(b),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the LGMA's decision. He found that it was justified in redacting, under section 36(1)(b) of the act, certain information from the records at issue.
Date: 21-12-2023
Case Number: OIC-134435-C8H4F4
Public Body: Local Government Management Agency
Section of the Act.: s.36, s.36(1)(b),
Summary: The Investigator annulled the HSE's decision and directed it to conduct a fresh decision on the applicant's FOI request.
Date: 20-12-2023
Case Number: OIC-141028-W4V8P3
Public Body: Health Service Executive
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a), s.15(1)(d),
Summary: The Investigator affirmed the decision of the Department.
Date: 20-12-2023
Case Number: OIC-143117-B4D7L6
Public Body: Department of Social Protection
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a),