Summary: The Investigator affirmed the decision of the National Archives.
Date: 18-12-2024
Case Number: OIC-150146-Z5L1C1
Public Body: National Archives
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a),
Summary: The Investigator annulled the Defence Forces decision and directed it to consider the applicant’s request afresh.
Date: 18-12-2024
Case Number: OIC-151703-V2B6N2
Public Body: The Defence Forces
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a), s.29
Summary: The Senior Investigator annulled Revenue’s decision and directed it to consider the request afresh.
Date: 18-12-2024
Case Number: OIC-150867-D4V4R9
Public Body: Office of the Revenue Commissioners
Section of the Act.: s.12, s.12(1)(b),
Summary: The Senior Investigator annulled the Council’s decision. He directed the release of the information sought.
Date: 17-12-2024
Case Number: OIC-140202-P2S7C2
Public Body: Dublin City Council
Section of the Act.: s.37, s.37(1),
Summary: The Investigator affirmed the decision of the Council
Date: 17-12-2024
Case Number: OIC-150010-V7N2X9
Public Body: Wexford County Council
Section of the Act.: s.32, s.32(1)(a), s.36, s.36(1)(b),
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the Department’s decision. He found that the Department was justified in withholding a small amount of information contained in two of the records at issue under sections 32(1)(a)(iii), 32(1)(a)(ix) and 35(1)(b) of the FOI Act. He found that it was not justified in refusing access to the vast majority of the records under sections 32(1), 35(1), or 36(1) and he directed the release of those records.
Date: 17-12-2024
Case Number: OIC-130458-Y1S5D2
Public Body: Department of Transport
Section of the Act.: s.31, s.31(1)(a), s.35, s.35(1)(a), s.35(1)(b), s.36, s.36(1)(b), s.36(1)(c),
Summary: The Commissioner affirmed the HSE’s decision to refuse access to the records at issue under section 30(1)(a) of the FOI Act.
Date: 17-12-2024
Case Number: OIC-151414-Q7M3D9
Public Body: Health Service Executive
Section of the Act.: s.30, s.30(1)(a),
Summary: The Commissioner affirmed the decision of the Courts Service to refuse the request under section 42(a)(i) of the Act.
Date: 17-12-2024
Case Number: OIC-150117-D8X3G1
Public Body: The Courts Service
Section of the Act.: s.42, s.42(a),
Summary: The Investigator varied the decision of Tusla. He affirmed its decision to refuse access to parts 1,3 and 5 of the applicant’s request under section 15(1)(a) of the Act. He found that Tusla was not justified in refusing accessing to the data it refused under section 37(1) of the Act relating to parts 2 and 4 of the applicant’s request and directed the release of that data.
Date: 17-12-2024
Case Number: OIC-149137-H2X8W6
Public Body: Tusla
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a), s.37, s.37(1),
Summary: The Investigator varied the decision of BIM
Date: 16-12-2024
Case Number: OIC-142189-V7Z8J1
Public Body: An Bord Iascaigh Mhara
Section of the Act.: s.37, s.37(1),