Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the Council was justified in its decision to refuse access to the records under sections 30(1)(a) and 31(1)(a) of the FOI Act. She affirmed the decision of the Council.
Date: 15-07-2015
Case Number: 150081
Public Body: Clare County Council
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the Department was justified in its decision to refuse access to the record sought by the applicant under section 15(1)(a) of the FOI Act. She affirmed the decision of the Department
Date: 15-07-2015
Case Number: 150075
Public Body: The Department of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed Revenue's refusal of access to the information in the records under section 21(1)(a) of the FOI Act.
Date: 15-07-2015
Case Number: 150036
Public Body: The Office of the Revenue Commissioners
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Council by finding that the refusal of access to records by the Council is justified under section 15(1)(a) and section 15(1)(i)(i) of the FOI Act.
Date: 13-07-2015
Case Number: 150043
Public Body: Mayo County Council
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Commissioner found that the Service was not justified in refusing access to parts of the records at issue. He varied the Service's decision, directing the release of certain records, in part.
Date: 10-07-2015
Case Number: 140158
Public Body: Houses of the Oireachtas Commission
Section of the Act.: s.23, s.26, s.28
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the section 38 requirements were not applied correctly in this case to such an extent that the Commissioner had not jurisdiction to deal further with it. She annulled the decision of the Department
Date: 10-07-2015
Case Number: 150175
Public Body: Department of Transport, Tourism and Sport
Section of the Act.: s.38
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the HSE was justified in deciding to refuse access to the records, in accordance with section 30(1)(a) and section 37(1) of the FOI Act. She affirmed the decision of the HSE.
Date: 10-07-2015
Case Number: 150031
Public Body: Health Service Executive Mid Leinster
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the section 38 requirements were not applied correctly in this case and annulled the decision of the Department/
Date: 10-07-2015
Case Number: 150157
Public Body: Department of Environment, Community and Local Government
Section of the Act.: s.38, s.38(2), s.38(3)(a),
Summary: The Senior Investigator found that the Department was justified in its decision to refuse access to the records sought. He affirmed the decision of the Department.
Date: 02-07-2015
Case Number: 150069
Public Body: Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine
Section of the Act.:
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the decision of the Defence Forces and found that the applicant was not entitled to the statement of reasons sought
Date: 29-06-2015
Case Number: 150066
Public Body: The Defence Forces
Section of the Act.: s.10