Summary: The Investigator affirmed the revised position taken by the Council during the review that the details at issue should be released. She found that the details were not exempt under either sections 35 (confidential information) or 36 (commercially sensitive information) of the FOI Act and directed their release.
Date: 28-06-2023
Case Number: OIC-134638-P9B3S1
Public Body: Dublin City Council
Section of the Act.: s.35, s.35(1), s.35(2), s.36, s.36(1)(a), s.36(1)(b), s.36(1)(c),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the Judicial Council's decision.
Date: 28-06-2023
Case Number: OIC-136148-M0L2F7
Public Body: Judicial Council
Section of the Act.: s.35
Summary: The Investigator affirmed the decision of the HSE.
Date: 28-06-2023
Case Number: OIC-134838-N9Q3D6
Public Body: Health Service Executive
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a),
Summary: The Investigator affirmed the decision of the HSE
Date: 26-06-2023
Case Number: OIC-137333-J6X1K9
Public Body: Health Service Executive
Section of the Act.: s.37, s.37(1), s.37(8)(a),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Council.
Date: 20-06-2023
Case Number: OIC-128440-R2J0L8
Public Body: Donegal County Council
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a),
Summary: The Investigator annulled the Department's decision and directed it to release a record.
Date: 20-06-2023
Case Number: OIC-132886-V5B5Y4
Public Body: Department of Justice
Section of the Act.: s.29
Summary: The Investigator affirmed the decision of the HSE.
Date: 19-06-2023
Case Number: OIC-137252-X5H4D6
Public Body: Health Service Executive
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a),
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the HSE's decision. She found that the HSE was justified in refusing to grant access to certain records on the basis of section 31(1)(a). She also found that the HSE was justified in refusing access to other records on the basis of sections 30(1)(c), 36(1)(b) and 36(1)(c). She found that the public interest, on balance, did not favour their release. She found that the HSE had not justified the refusal of the remaining records in full or in part and directed their release.
Date: 06-06-2023
Case Number: OIC-112138-T6G7X5
Public Body: Health Service Executive
Section of the Act.: s.30, s.30(1)(c), s.31, s.31(1)(a), s.36, s.36(1)(b), s.36(1)(c),
Summary: The Investigator varied the Department's decision
Date: 14-06-2023
Case Number: OIC-132226-X2M6C7
Public Body: Department of Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science
Section of the Act.: s.29, s.29(1), s.30, s.30(1)(a), s.30(1)(b), s.30(1)(c), s.30(2), s.36, s.36(1)(b),
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the Commission's decision. While he found that it was justified in redacting, under section 31(1)(a) of the Act, certain information from one of the records, he found that it was not justified in redacting information from the second record and directed its release.
Date: 13-06-2023
Case Number: OIC-134194-B4G0G2
Public Body: Standards in Public Office Commission
Section of the Act.: s.31, s.31(1)(a),