Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed TU Dublin's decision.
Date: 22-12-2022
Case Number: OIC-111728-D1G4S7
Public Body: Technological University Dublin
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a),
Summary: The Investigator affirmed ATU's decision
Date: 22-12-2022
Case Number: OIC-126022-G7D3H5
Public Body: Atlantic Technological University
Section of the Act.: s.37, s.37(1),
Summary: The Investigator varied the Council's decision.
Date: 22-12-2022
Case Number: OIC-122728-W6D1M6
Public Body: Laois County Council
Section of the Act.: s.35, s.35(1)(a), s.37, s.37(1), s.37(7),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the CSSO's decision.
Date: 21-12-2022
Case Number: OIC-127117-S9X9P6
Public Body: Chief State Solicitor's Office
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(d), s.42, s.42(f),
Summary: The Investigator affirmed the decision of the Department.
Date: 21-12-2022
Case Number: OIC-129460-S4L3W5
Public Body: Department of Justice
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a),
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the decision of the Department. He found that it was justified in redacting certain information from the records under section 37(1), apart from a small amount of information to which he found section 37(1) not to apply. He found that the Department was justified in refusing access to two records under section 33(1)(d) of the Act.
Date: 22-12-2022
Case Number: OIC-113680-D4B6T7
Public Body: Department of Foreign Affairs
Section of the Act.: s.33, s.33(1)(d), s.37, s.37(1),
Summary: The Investigator affirmed the decision of the HSE.
Date: 20-12-2022
Case Number: OIC-131565-Y5S5J5
Public Body: Health Service Executive
Section of the Act.: s.37
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the Council's decision. He found that the Council was justified in refusing access to certain records on the basis of section 15(1)(a) and 36(1)(b) of the FOI Act and found that the public interest, on balance, did not favour their release. He found that the Council was not justified in refusing access to other records on the basis of sections 35(1)(a), 36(1)(b) and 36(1)(c). He directed their release, subject to the redaction of personal information.
Date: 20-12-2022
Case Number: OIC-122178-Z9M1M9
Public Body: Dublin City Council
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a), s.35, s.35(1)(a), s.35(1)(b), s.36, s.36(1)(b), s.36(1)(c),
Summary: The Senior Investigator varied the decision of the NGI. He directed the release of the redacted parts of the records that fall within the scope of the request, apart from a small amount of information he found to be exempt under section 37(1).
Date: 20-12-2022
Case Number: OIC-113993-L6S4L0
Public Body: The National Gallery of Ireland
Section of the Act.: s.29, s.29(1), s.35, s.35(1), s.36, s.36(1)(b), s.36(1)(c), s.37, s.37(1),
Summary: The Investigator annulled the decision of the NAS and directed it to carry out a fresh decision making process.
Date: 19-12-2022
Case Number: OIC-123331-N4P6C7
Public Body: National Ambulance Service
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a), s.15(1)(c),